Central Texas Weather and News Authority
Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Politics  ·   Job Board  ·   CarSoup  ·   Food  ·   Calendar  ·   TV  ·   Contact Us  ·   10 Cares  ·   Our Town Texas
Dot Com Daily · KWTX To Go · Desktop Alert · Fun & Games · Green Page
NOT A Tornado!KWTX Blog Listing
NOT A Tornado!
Topic Author: Keith Cavey
Posted: 9:35 PM May 15, 2008
Replies Posted: 5 comments
Save Email Print
 del.icio.us   Google   Yahoo  digg
Recent Blog Topics
College Baseball’s Hallowed Home
Iowa Floods
First Tropical Storm of '08
My Tax Rebate Check Arrived
Hurricane Season Already?!
The Unfriendly Skies
Post Your Comments
First Name:
Email (optional):
Location:
Enter Comments:  
   characters left
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.

NOT A Tornado!

           

Usually, when a storm does substantial damage, and especially when there's a possibility the damage was done by a tornado, one of our local National Weather Service offices sends a team to conduct a survey of the damage. These surveys are conducted to determine whether the damage was caused by straight-line wind or a tornado, the estimated wind speed within the storm, and the EF-scale rating of the tornado, if there was one.

The meteorologists who conduct these damage surveys receive specialized training based on years of engineering and weather research. Think of them as the CSI's of severe weather... the damage left by the storm is a trail of clues that they follow and examine carefully to help them figure out exactly what happened.

Here's the official statement released by the National Weather Service Forecast Office in Fort Worth:

ON THURSDAY AFTERNOON...STAFF FROM THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN
FORT WORTH SURVEYED THE DAMAGE FROM THE WEDNESDAY MORNING STORM
IN BELL COUNTY. BASED ON THE OBSERVED DAMAGE AND OVERALL
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DAMAGE PATH...IT WAS DETERMINED THAT A SWATH
OF INTENSE WINDS MOVED THROUGH THE SOUTHERN AND EASTERN PORTION OF
THE COUNTY. MAXIMUM WINDS WERE LIKELY IN THE 70-75 MPH RANGE...OR
NEAR HURRICANE FORCE.

THE OBSERVED DAMAGE SWATH EXTENDED FROM WEST OF SALADO...ACROSS
SALADO AND LITTLE RIVER-ACADEMY...NORTH OF HOLLAND...AND TO
THE ZABCIKVILLE-ROGERS AREA.

IN SALADO...NUMEROUS TREES HAD LARGE LIMBS BROKEN...SOME WERE
SNAPPED AT THE TRUNK...AND A FEW WERE UPROOTED. DESPITE THE
WIDESPREAD TREE DAMAGE...IMPACTS ON STRUCTURES WERE RELATIVELY
MINOR. SEVERAL STORAGE BUILDINGS WERE DAMAGED...AND A FEW HOMES
SUFFERED MINOR ROOF DAMAGE. ADDITIONAL HOMES WERE DAMAGED WHEN
IMPACTED BY FALLING TREES OR LIMBS.

THE DAMAGE SWATH CONTINUED EAST...WITH ADDITIONAL TREE AND ROOF
SHINGLE DAMAGE IN AND SOUTH OF LITTLE RIVER-ACADEMY. THE MOST
SUBSTANTIAL STRUCTURAL DAMAGE WAS OBSERVED BETWEEN HEIDENHEIMER AND
ROGERS. SEVERAL MOBILE HOMES HAD ROOF DAMAGE OR WERE MOVED. TWO
LARGE BARNS HAD TIN WALLS OR SECTIONS OF TIN ROOF REMOVED. A GRAIN
SILO WAS DAMAGED NEAR ZABCIKVILLE.

THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE DAMAGE WAS ORIENTED IN A WEST-NORTHWEST TO
EAST-NORTHEAST DIRECTION. THE DAMAGE SWATH SPREAD OUT IN A FAN-LIKE
PATTERN FROM THE INITIATION POINT WEST OF SALADO. WHILE IT IS
ENTIRELY POSSIBLE THAT SOME SMALL SCALE SWIRLS OR TURBULENCE WERE
EMBEDDED IN THE WIND SWATH...THE EVIDENCE SUGGESTS THAT A SIGNIFICANT
TORNADIC CIRCULATION WAS NOT PRESENT.

This last paragraph says the most about why a tornado is not the most likely suspect in this case. If a tornado had caused the damage, the debris would have been strewn around in multiple directions, instead of fanned out from west to east. Also, the damage path would have been much narrower. The near-hurricane force winds blew down trees across the entire village of Salado. Most tornadoes are less than a hundred yards wide.

The report does talk about "small scale swirls" and "turbulence". As wind strikes objects like trees and buildings, it tends to swirl around a bit. You've probably seen this if you've stood on the side of your house or workplace on a windy autumn day, and watched leaves or trash swirling around the corner of the building. But these small swirls in the wind pattern do not constitute a tornado.

Read Comments
Posted by: Jimmy Location: Belton
I recall watching that storm on radar. It was the first time I've ever seen rotation in a radar image. It was definitely a large cell.

Posted by: a mom Location: bell county
Yes I too apppreciate the coverage Channel 10 provides - everyone there is calm and the coverage is very specific & that keeps the public calm & free of panic - which leads to more compliance with requests to take shelter. Several Years ago another local station had a weatherman - who wanted to have everyone "take shelter" every time a rain cloud came up - he was the boy who "cried wolf" & it got to the point that no one paid attention to him. In our house - If Channel 10 tells you to seek shelter - we are there. Again THANKS to the entire weather team - the service you provide to the community is always above & beyond. CHANNEL 10 WEATHER IS #1.

Posted by: Keith Cavey Location: Waco
I’m not sure why he would say that. As you can see, the statement released by the National Weather Service is very clear: the damage was not caused by a tornado. Gary Woodall is the Warning Coordination Meteorologist at the NWS office in Fort Worth, and the person who oversaw the damage survey in Bell County. He has received a lot of specialized training and has many years of experience performing these types of damage surveys. So if he says the damage was caused by straight-line winds, I’m inclined to believe him.

Posted by: Anonymous Didn't Matt Hines at 25 say there WAS a tornado, like an f1 or f2, why would he say that?

Posted by: Sandra Location: Bosque County
Hi Keith, Just wanted to say thank you to you and Rusty for staying up all night ( 2 nights)to keep an eye on things and for doing a great job of keeping us informed. I love the live stream on the website! It was very interesting! Thanks again to all your weather team!