Central Texas Weather and News Authority
Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Politics  ·   Job Board TV  ·   CarSoup  ·   Food  ·   Calendar  ·   TV  ·   Contact Us  ·   10 Cares  ·   Our Town Texas
Dot Com Daily · KWTX To Go · Desktop Alert · Fun & Games · Green Page
Win Tickets to the David Phelps Christmas Concert!
KWTX Gift Shoppe - Shop Now!
2008 High School Playoffs
Week 2
Poll Question
A Democratic plan calls for spending $25 billion to bail out the U.S. auto industry. What do you think?

Good Idea
Bad Idea


Show and Tell
Youc@st
Upload your favorite videos and pictures!
Blogs
Random thoughts by the News 10 team. Leave us your comments!
iWitness
You see it, you report it. News by you. Submit your news stories and photos.
News 10 My Way
KWTX.com
Make KWTX.com your browser's homepage.

.com Daily
Your News and weather and sports delivered to your inbox weekday mornings. Sign Up Now!

KWTX To Go
Anytime. Anywhere. Now you can get News 10 on your wireless device.

Desktop Alert
Get instant weather and news on your desktop. Download News 10 Alert FREE!
Texas Gas Prices
Concerns About HPV Vaccine Arise Save Email Print

A | A | A

(June 6, 2008)—After nearly two years on the market, concerns about the HPV Vaccine Gardasil have arisen in North Texas.

In June 2006, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted to recommend the first vaccine developed to prevent cervical cancer and other diseases in females caused by certain types ofgenital human papillomavirus (HPV).

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website, “the vaccine, Gardasil, protects against four HPV types, which together cause 70% of cervical cancers and 90% of genital warts.”

The vaccine is given through a series of three injections over a six-month period.

But a Dallas teenager says she has had increasingly adverse side effects after receiving the second injection of that vaccination.

Katherine Kimzey, 14, told the Dallas Morning News she had headaches and fainting spells before suffering a seizure and being diagnosed with epilepsy.

She believes her symptoms are connected to the HPV vaccine, Gardasil.

Katherine’s mother, Michelle Kimzey says her daughter’s symptoms mirrored many of the 5,000 reports filed by the public through a national database that monitors the safety of vaccines after they are licensed.

"When you read everybody's stories, they're too similar not to be related,” she said.

But, according to the Dallas Morning News report, officials with the CDC as well as doctors nationwide say such concerns about the drug are unfounded and most significant side effects reported are unrelated to the vaccine.

The CDC website reports concerns about the safety and efficiency of the vaccine Gardasil.

It says since the vaccine has been licensed, the most common side effects have been local injection site reactions such as fainting.

There have, however, been at least three deaths reported in connection to the more than five million doses of Gardasil that have been administered, one involving a pulmonary embolism; one myocarditis due to influenza-A infection; and one from a blood clot.


More Stories
Police Warn Of Counterfeit Tech-OU Tickets

Police: "We Feel That It Was Arson"

Refinery Explosion Victim Dies

Duplex Fire Leaves Infant Dead

Early-Morning Fire Kills 27 Horses

Dr Pepper To Deliver After Release Of “Chinese Democracy”

More Cell Phone Gear Turns Up On Death Row

Former TEA Inspectors Sue

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Karen Location: MA on Jul 9, 2008 at 10:54 PM
As a professional who has submitted test data to the FDA for medical device companies, let me tell you all how the system REALLY works. I was terminated the day I refused to sugar-coat test data saying a product was unsafe. What a coincidence. My former company changed my report according to a former coworker, and the FDA approved the product. The product was released for sale and failed several times in patients before the company just quietly stopped selling it. The FDA did not shut them down. The FDA does NOT require long-term safety studies to release a product. They barely have the manpower to review the cheesy data some companies submit. YOU ARE A GUINEA PIG if you try a new drug in the US. Period.

Posted by: Amanda on Jun 11, 2008 at 12:48 PM
I would like to see anyone who has watched their child suffer and die from an immunization, turn around and take their next child in to be vaccinated. I have been blasted by people for choosing not to immunize my younger child. I say when they have nightmares every night about their child dying and live with the horrible guilt from remembering the times you held them down for their shot and assured them they would be okay, then they can tell me what I ought to do. People who have not had a problem with vaccines but choose not to vaccinate because they do not trust them, are not stupid either. Contrary to popular belief, doctors are not God, and the medical community does not always have the publics best interest at heart. I am not saying they are all bad, but I think people need to do a little more thinking for themselves. Then if you still choose to follow doctors advice about vaccinating or whatever else, that is entirely up to you.

Posted by: Against Vaccinations Location: Hewitt on Jun 11, 2008 at 10:34 AM
Undecided-my heart goes out to you! The fact that someone who suffers from HPV is reconsidering whether or not to give this vaccination to their child really speaks volumes to me! Good luck with your decision and God bless!

Posted by: undecided on Jun 11, 2008 at 09:42 AM
This has probably been one of the most diffuclt decisions I have been dealt with so far as a parent. I have a 12 yr.old daughter. She has an appt. this mo. to get this vaccine. But, in light of this article, I may cancel. She is still young enough that by the time she is 15 or 16 hopefully this vaccine will be more studied & safer. I got hpv from my first husband & have suffered in many ways from this disease. I am thankful to have been able to even have children. So, I know firsthand how devastating this virus can be. I want to protect my daughter in every way that I can, but I do agree that this vaccine needs more research. There should be a version for boys also.

Posted by: Against Vaccinations Location: Hewitt on Jun 11, 2008 at 08:02 AM
Informed-What if my child did contract this disease and found out there was a vaccine available to protect them and I "refused" to give it to them? We could spend all day talking about "WHAT IFS". What if I gave them the vaccination and they had a complication and died? What if I had to watch my child suffer from these complications? What if...what if... I love both of my children with every heartbeat, but let's be realistic...we make choices on a daily basis that could be life or death choices. It's all about going with what you personally think is best for your children. I believe vaccines are not worth the risk, and you believe they are. Thankfully we have the right to decide what is best for our children. We aren't always going to make the best choices. Some of these choices are going to have devastating results. We will have to live with these choices. This is life. This is one of the hardest things about being a parent in my opinion.

Posted by: not doing it Location: texas on Jun 11, 2008 at 12:47 AM
Informed--you are right in that HPV is one of the most prevalent STD's in our society. In fact, at least 25% of the population may have it, and ,most do not even know it. But the problem comes here--the only thing that would be a danger to my child from having this virus is the possibility of having cervical cancer. This is not a cancer that develops quickly, and it rarely occurs to begin with. Now, I am all for protecting my child from even the possibility of ever contracting this. But I just don't see at this point in development, how the benefits outweight the risks, since we don't know what the risks are on the vaccine side. This is one of those debates in which everyone has a strong opinion, but I just think that maybe this time, the pharmaceutical companies looking to make money on this should not make our decisions by scaring us with "facts" on this virus.

Posted by: informed Location: anywhere on Jun 10, 2008 at 10:35 PM
To Against Vaccinations: It is your choice whether or not to vaccinate your children. As far as vaccinating them against a disease they will not likely get?...You should visit hpv.com or the link on this website to the cancer society. In 2005, approx. 20 million Americans had hpv, with more than 6 million new cases each year. You can have this disease & not know it. What if your child did contract this disease & found out there was a vaccine available to protect them and you refused to give it to them? What if you had to watch your daughter die from cervical cancer knowing you could have prevented it? Just something to ponder. I think you can agree that it is with most certainty that your child will grow up to have sex and you have no say as to who they have sex with. Personally, I think they should have a vaccine for this disease for men. Why should the girls and women take all the risk?

Posted by: Against Vaccinations Location: Hewitt on Jun 10, 2008 at 08:25 AM
Anonymous you say, "I refuse to tell my daughters that there was a vaccine that could have spared them a disease but I didn't let them get it." You are absolutely right, it is your choice, your children. However, I refuse to tell my children that I vaccinated them against a disease they will likely not get, but in the process exposed them to horrible side effects. Everyone has to make the choice that's best for their family, which it sounds like we are doing.

Posted by: Texas Location: Texas on Jun 10, 2008 at 07:49 AM
Yes, anonymous, in case you failed to notice, I am an imature ignorant child. IF I ever plan to move my kids to a third world country, I may have to get them immunized. BTW I didn't accuse you of name calling. I said that IF you were intending to lay blame at MY feet. Guess I got my answer since you seem to have taken offense. For further reference, I have a very good education thank you. IIRC you started the "debate" by telling me I was responsible for the spread of HPV by choosing not to have my children vaccinated. If you can't swim, you may want to avoid the deep end of the pool from now on. The END.

Posted by: not doing it Location: texas on Jun 10, 2008 at 12:46 AM
And to "anonymous"--you do realize that the vaccine only protects against a few of the more prevalent strains of HPV, not the entire disease, and that it will still be possible for your child to contract the disease. It is like getting the flu shot, you hope that you are protected, but you never REALLY know. It is naive to say that you are vaccinating your daughter for my protection. If it was really that much of a danger, then perhaps they should have also come up with a vaccine for MEN as well. But I guess that is too much to ask...

Posted by: anonymous Location: central texas on Jun 9, 2008 at 11:48 PM
I must have stepped on some toes. my kids, their future, our choice....same for you. as with any shot, procedure, come risks..you decide yours and I will decide mine.Vaccines for young children help build up an immunity to childhood diseases which kill children in third world countries.I can't unring a bell but I refuse to tell my daughters that their was a vaccine that could have spared them a disease but I didn't let them get it. my choice, your choice. I did not plan on debating and did not post that way; I posted my family plan and thoughts. Accusations and name calling only show your maturity and educational level.

Posted by: Texas Location: Texas on Jun 9, 2008 at 07:32 PM
"protect your children and those who come in contact with them" So are you going to blame ME for someone else getting HPV because I chose NOT to have my kids vaccinated?? What a moronic statement. I am not going to debate my decision, period. MY kids MY choice. I will not have to worry about my daughter dying from unproven side effects. You can unring a bell. Those mothers who got their girls a vaccination that resulted in their death would probably change that decision if they could now. I cant justify looking into a coffin and teling my dead child, "i'm sorry, I THOUGHT it was safe". Like I said, we all have to do what is right for us and ours, but to even insinuate that we as those oppased are responsible for the spread of HPV is rediculous and ignorant.

Posted by: anonymous Location: central texas on Jun 9, 2008 at 03:58 PM
My 3 daughters will get this vaccine.It is a choice of life versus death. We can teach our children to wait but I want my girls to be protected.I can teach the lessons but there is a world out there beyond my reach...I know everyone on this board was a virgin when married, I for one remember the teen years when your mind says one thing, your heart another, and your body is screaming at you. My children are vaccinated for their protection and yours....which is why their classmates who went without had such a bad case of chicken pox. we are no longer living in a cave, protect your children and those who come in contact with them. I pick life for my children, not cervical cancer.

Posted by: not doing it Location: Texas on Jun 9, 2008 at 02:48 PM
Most of these comments are focusing on the vaccine as a means to prevent HPV, which is a noble cause. But it does no good to vaccinate your children for something without knowing the long term effects. This drug simply is too new. It was rushed to the market because of how amazing it was. Wouldn't it be tragic if we are setting up a whole generation of children to take a fall far worse than a disease like HPV. THe number of women who will die of cervical cancer is incredibly low, and with preventative steps like annual Pap smears, easy to catch in early stages. I remember hearing of the devastation that was caused by the birth control that some women took a few decades back. Is this really something that we want to force upon our daughters, without being sure that it is completely safe? My daughter is 9 now, and maybe by the time that she is 17 or 18 there will have been more research done, and she can make that decision, but that is a risk that I am not willing to take now.

Posted by: Texas Location: Texas on Jun 9, 2008 at 02:10 PM
anonymous, I agree with the fact that condoms dont protect you. My point was, *I* am not going to make this kind of decision for my young daughters. IMO it is too risky and hasnt been proven to be a risk free vaccine. they dont even know how long the protection will last or what the long term effects can be. When my girls are old enough to make the decision I will support whatever they choose to do. I am making a conscious decision to NOT subject them to a potentially deadly injection. I think this should just be chlaked up to one of those personal choice, personal decision topics. There is never going to be a right or wrong. Everyone has to decide for themseves. It wasnt my intention to sway anyone, I was only stating my opinion on why *I* feel this isnt the best choice for MY family.

Posted by: anonymous on Jun 8, 2008 at 05:50 PM
For Me & Texas. If you think a condom will protect you from this disease, you did not do your research. I also caught hpv from my first husband. Many biopsies and surgeries later, I am now clear. But, if you did your research, you would know you still have the virus and it could come back and bite you anytime. It is something you will always have to monitor. I have 2 daughters and am hoping this vaccine is safe. I would not want them to go thru what I have been thru. Just because your daughters remain virgins till marriage doesn't mean their husband did!

Posted by: me Location: here on Jun 7, 2008 at 10:25 PM
I agree about condoms that's common sense but I caught it from my husband while trying to get pregnant. Married couple's don't always wear condoms and there is the chance that he could have it if he's ever been with someone else. And we have both been married before. I'm not saying to give the vaccine to your child. Just educate yourself and your children on it because it is a serious issue. Had I not had to deal with it I wouldn't have given my daughter the vaccine either. I knew the risks of her getting it and the risks of her not getting it. My decision to give it to her was based on the research I did and the fact that it's so hard to detect. Even in women. Every medicine we take has risks. Texas, your decision to let them choose as an adult is a good way to go also. Yes I am well as of now. It's been only 3 months and my first check was good. I'm not bashing anyone's decision on this issue just asking that everyone educate themselves well on this issue.

Posted by: Texas Location: Texas on Jun 7, 2008 at 08:07 PM
For "me" from "here". I'm really glad you have a reason to validate your daughter getting the vaccine. Personally *I* dont feel the drug is safe enough to subject MY daughters to it. When they get old enough to make that decision, then I hope they make an informed one and they have the knowledge at hand to weigh the pros and cons effectively. The point should be, whether you sleep with 1 man 2 men or 100 men...you have to protect yourself from a lot more than HPV. Getting a vaccine isnt the ONLY way to protect yourself. CONDOMS come to mind. I hope you are doing well and i'm glad your daughter apparently didnt have adverse side effects. I'm not willing to risk it with my kids when it is my decision to make.

Posted by: me Location: here on Jun 7, 2008 at 06:07 PM
I'm not bashing anyone for not wanting their daughter to have the injection. However I do think that some of you would benefit from researching HPV. Men carry it and they cannot test a man for it. If you only sleep with one or two ppl your entire life you can still get it. There is no way to trace it back to someone unless you've only been with one person. We would all like to believe that our children won't have sex till marriage and will only sleep with one person but the truth is that that probably will not happen. I was against the mandatory immunization also then this year at 28 years old I was one step below cervical cancer from this virus. A few more months before they caught it and I would have had full blown cervical cancer. My daughter got the shots after that. I started her on the shot 3 days after I found out that I had a serious health issue. I did a lot of research first though. Just research it because it's one of those tings that hits hard when it hits you.

Posted by: Mother of a daughter Location: texas on Jun 7, 2008 at 01:19 AM
And to think back when our bright governor was wanting to pass a law to make young girls get this injection, I made a comment on one of these boards that my daughter, 9 yrs old now, would not be getting this shot even when she came of age. I was jumped like a T-bone by a hungry pack of dogs. People were telling me I just did not love my daughter or care for her health...THIS is exactly why my daughter will not be getting this shot. My plan is to do my best to teach her right from wrong and to love her body, mind and spirit. If I fail, I think we will still stand a better chance than with an experimental drug.

Posted by: Against Vaccinations Location: Hewitt on Jun 6, 2008 at 08:50 PM
And yet another reason why I choose not to immunize my children.

Posted by: Texas Location: Texas on Jun 6, 2008 at 02:19 PM
Now arent we all glad that our governor was out voted when trying to make it mandatory for all young girls over the age of 11 to get this vaccine in Texas? I have 3 daughters and none of them have or will have this vaccine. We are way too dependant on drugs and vaccines to protect our kids when there is no way of ANYONE knowing the long term effect. The diseases that this vaccine protects against are caused by unprotected sex. If your child doesnt have sex until marriage then they dont need the vaccine. Maybe we should be educating our girls in the ways of self respect and not depend so much on drugs to do it for us. I'm not ignorant, and I do work in the medical field but I dont believe in giving drugs for every little thing either. One of the reasons why we have infections running rampant is because parents are so quick to give their children antibiotics. As parents we should ALL be more cognizant of what we do to our kids in the name of prevention. Just a thought.

Posted by: Supergirl Location: Robinson on Jun 6, 2008 at 10:35 AM
LOL FarRemoved. I thought a local injection reaction was a rash or itching/swelling of the injection site but fainting!!! Nuts.

Posted by: Mary Location: Cove on Jun 6, 2008 at 10:16 AM
James, I can't even comment on what an ignorant comment that is.

Posted by: FarRemoved Location: Waco on Jun 6, 2008 at 09:58 AM
"It says since the vaccine has been licensed, the most common side effects have been local injection site reactions such as fainting." Does this mean one would faint either to the right or left, depending on which side their injection is given.........does anyone edit this stuff!? LOL

Posted by: A Mom Location: Temple on Jun 6, 2008 at 09:16 AM
In this day and age when pharmaceutical companies have strong lobbyists and the general public no longer cares more about their neighbor than themselves, I don't trust the CDC or Food and Drug Administration as I once did. The near history has shown repeated release of drugs that were not safe to only have them pulled off the shelf again. Usually following many deaths. I was irate when our governor was going to make this a mandatory vaccine. I don't want my family involved in real-life experiments and used as human guinea pigs!!

Posted by: a mother... Location: at home on Jun 6, 2008 at 09:03 AM
who knows whether her siezure would have happened without the HPV vaccination, but i refuse to have my child get it right now because i dont feel they know enough about it to make me feel as if it is safe enough. you never know how you will respond to any vaccine until you get it.

Posted by: james Location: Waco on Jun 6, 2008 at 06:51 AM
I find it interesting that you would present a parent's belief that her child's seizure would not have occured without this vaccine. Her belief does not make it fact. Maby we should have let her get HPV naturally as 30% of college age women have done and see if she had a seizure then. Since the wild disease is not known to trigger seizures, this link is tenuous. Just because I get run over by a car after I get a sunburn doesn't mean the sunburn caused it.

Latest Video
AP Video
KWTX.com Features
Double Dollar Deals
Half Price Deals at Central Texas restaurants and businesses. A new deal every Thursday at 7:00am.
KWTX Half Price Gift Shoppe
Holiday shopping on a budget! Check out the Holiday Half-Off Gift Shoppe at KWTX.com, where you will find $50 gift certificates for only $25, beginning November 10th.
Golden Apple
Your chance to nominate an outstanding teacher. Find out how they are making a difference in classrooms.
Emily Wants to Know
Emily Matthews' inquisitive look at life in Central Texas.
10 On Your Side
Answers from our experts on topics that affect YOU.
Soldier Stories
Stories about what the men and women deployed overseas are doing to make a difference.
Chef Walter
Need a fresh idea for dinner? Check out thousands of FREE recipes
Station Information
Job Board TV
See the latest video job postings.

Program Guide
Check out when your favorite TV programs are on.
Contact News 10
Information about KWTX.
Meet the News 10 Team
Read about your favorite News 10 personalities.
Job of the Week
Click now to see hundreds of other jobs on Job Board TV!

Part-Time Registered Nurse Labor and Delivery Dept. (7P - 7A) - Qualified candidates must possess a Texas license with two (2) years of experience preferred. Minimum requirement of Associate Degree Nursing (ADN).



Also, take a look at the most recent jobs posted to Job Board TV at KWTX.com:
View More Jobs.