Central Texas Weather and News Authority
Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Politics  ·   Job Board TV  ·   CarSoup  ·   Food  ·   Calendar  ·   TV  ·   Contact Us  ·   10 Cares  ·   Our Town Texas
Dot Com Daily · KWTX To Go · Desktop Alert · Fun & Games · Green Page · Soldier Greetings
The National Weather Service has issued a RED FLAG WARNING in effect until 6 pm for Bell, Bosque, Coryell, Falls, Freestone, Hamilton, Hill, Lampasas, Leon, Limestone, McLennan, Milam, Mills, Navarro, Robertson, and Williamson counties in Central Texas. The combination of strong south winds, low relative humidity, and dry vegetation will create an extreme danger for grass fires across Central Texas this afternoon.
Win Tickets to the David Phelps Christmas Concert!
KWTX Gift Shoppe - Shop Now!
2008 High School Playoffs
Week 4 Pairings
Poll Question
There are currently no active polls at this time.
Click here to view other polls on our site and past poll results.
Show and Tell
Youc@st
Upload your favorite videos and pictures!
Blogs
Random thoughts by the News 10 team. Leave us your comments!
iWitness
You see it, you report it. News by you. Submit your news stories and photos.
News 10 My Way
KWTX.com
Make KWTX.com your browser's homepage.

.com Daily
Your News and weather and sports delivered to your inbox weekday mornings. Sign Up Now!

KWTX To Go
Anytime. Anywhere. Now you can get News 10 on your wireless device.

Desktop Alert
Get instant weather and news on your desktop. Download News 10 Alert FREE!
Texas Gas Prices
Texas Couple Claims Dog Died During Interstate 35 Traffic Stop Save Email Print
156 comments
A | A | A

(August 14, 2008)--San Marcos police are investigating an officer who stopped a car on Interstate 35 as a man and his girlfriend rushed their pet poodle to an emergency veterinary clinic.

The couple claims the dog died while they were kept waiting for a speeding ticket.

Michael Gonzalez was allegedly driving 95 miles per hour when he and girlfriend Krystal Hernandez were stopped early Aug. 5 as they drove south on Interstate 35 toward the New Braunfels clinic.

Missy, their teacup poodle, died as the pair said they waited 20 minutes for Officer Paul Stephens to issue a ticket.

"This was not our finest hour,” said San Marcos Police Chief Howard Williams.

Williams said the department began an investigation after Gonzalez filed a complaint about the incident.

Gonzalez and Hernandez said they pleaded with Stephens to allow them to continue on and later turn themselves in to be ticketed.

They also said they offered for Gonzalez to stay behind while Hernandez drove with Missy to New Braunfels.

Hernandez said Stephens responded: "Chill out, it's just a dog, you can buy another one."
More Stories
Elderly Driver Freed On Bond After Parade Crash

Fire Heavily Damages Another Central Texas Home

Former First Lady Released From Hospital

Teenage Girl Accused Of Suffocating Infant With Teddy Bear

 Former Texas Inmate Denied Bond In Murders Of Daughter, Friend

Early-Morning Fire Leaves Four Families Homeless

Second Man Pleads Guilty In Pot-Smoking-Toddlers Case

Missing Central Texas Alzheimer’s Patient Found
Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: heychicky on Oct 27, 2008 at 11:10 AM
Sorry, but I don't understand why this couple thought it okay to put the lives of every motorist on that highway in danger just to save a pet. I understand our pets are our family, but if they had caused an accident due to their excess speed there would have been more deaths than just the dog.
Posted by: Mike Location: Brooklyn on Aug 30, 2008 at 11:16 AM
First, I just want to see what the procedure is for a police officer in that situation. The law is supreme and if it states that a speeding motorist must receive a ticket even if there is clear and present danger to an animal, then he is justified in doing so. In that case, the question would arise why it took 20 minutes to issue the ticket and a vet. would have to determine whether arriving at the clinic 20 minutes earlier would have saved the dog's life. Also, it is very possible that the couple is exagerating the 20 minutes and lying about the officer's comment. I wonder what the procedure is when a car is speeding to the hospital because a woman is in labor. In any case, I think speeding would often cause a more serious incident.
Posted by: DEBI Location: AUSTRALIA on Aug 30, 2008 at 06:49 AM
Am in total shock and disbelief that this poor couple not only watched their beloved pet pass away a terrible death but to be ridiculed for their love of Missy by a member of the police force who should be there to serve and protect as a caring member of the community. Surely the Texas Police Service could restore the community's faith by at least offering an apology to this couple & providing support/donations to the local animal rescue service in the area Hernando and Krystal live in to show they aren't as heartless as this one officer has shown the Department to be. Here in Australia this would not happen - only because yes u would be pulled over but there would not be any waving of weapons or treating a member of the public with ridicule & cynicism while being faced with a crying grown man with an equally distressed woman in the vehicle clutching a pet dog. The officer needs a reality check and get over his delusional power trip.
Posted by: TERESA GUZMAN Location: UNION CITY CALIFORNIA on Aug 27, 2008 at 11:22 AM
I FEEL THIS OFFICER NEEDS TO BE PUNISHED MORE THAN JUST A SUSPENSION WITH OUR PAY. POLICE OFFICERS OUR PAID TO WORK FOR & WITH THE COMMUNITY AND IN THIS CASE HE CLEARLY DOES NOT CARE, HIS OWN WORDS. I CAN UNDERSTAND HIM PULLING OVER THE COUPLE BUT ONCE HE SEES THE DOG IN DISTRESS HE SHOULD HAVE HELPED THEM GET THE DOG TO A VET AND TICKET THEM LATER IF HE CHOOSES TO. IT WAS INHUMAN FOR HIM TO TAKE 20 MINUTES TO WRITE UP A TICKET WHILE KNOWING THIS DOG WAS DYING IN THE CAR. THIS IS NO DIFFERANT THAN SOMEONE STARVING THEIR DOG KNOWING THAT THE DOG COULD DIE DUE TO THEIR ACTIONS. THIS OFFICER CLEARLY IS IN THE WRONG OCCUPATION. AN OFFICER SHOULD BE AGGESSIVE BUT ALSO CARING. THE ONLY THING YOU HEAR IN THE AUDIO IS HIS AGGRESSION. I HOPE THIS COUPLE GOES ALL THE WAY WITH PURSUEING THEIR COMPLAINT. IF ANYTHING JUST TO PROVE THE POINT. I FEEL FOR THIS COUPLE'S LOSS AND HOPE MISSY DEATH IS NOT FORGOTEN.
Posted by: Simon Location: Kenton on Aug 26, 2008 at 06:49 PM
What a jerk this cop is. I would have never stopped, but IF I did, I would have thrown my license, registration, and proof of insurance at this JERK and continued to the vet. If I was unable to do so, I guarantee you that either the JERK or I would have been lying on the ground after the dog died.
Posted by: Geoffrey Location: Florida on Aug 23, 2008 at 06:00 PM
Amy in Waco, Amazing is a rare trait. It is not an option used much. You cannot deny Stephens was a jerk. There are no rules against that but there are against a police escort for a dog. It is socially acceptable to bypass 911 for a human and endanger other humans to take that one to the hospital but not a dog. Remove the temptation, ban emergency vets. Slavery was socially acceptable and perectly legal but did that make it right? You say a human is more important but more imprtant than others on the road. It is rare to find a police car without instant access to NCIC. Long background checks are a lame excuse, just harrasment nowadays. Our local police surf the net whil driving. That is called "do as I say not as I do" The public sees these things and form the stereotypes. Don't fire him. Make him work for abused animal shelters on his own time. Suspension with pay is a free vacation. Think about the slavery comment. Stephens was legally right but was he really?
Posted by: Don Location: Wisconsin on Aug 23, 2008 at 05:46 PM
I find the behavior of officer Stephens dispicable.The couple is already distraught over their animal and the officer doesn't help matters by saying chill out, it's just a dog...you can buy another one, what are you on man.Imagine if this was a child and the child was dying and the couple decided to drive the speed limit for fear of breaking any law.If the child died on the way to the hospital,you can bet the couple would no doubt be cited for child endangerment,not being more expedient in trying to save his life by getting him there faster.There are laws against cruelty to animals which in many juristictions includes jail time. Though I don't condone speeding, or breaking the law this was a matter where poor judgement was most definitely used by someone where good judgement is part of the job.I personally think he should be relieved from his position of 'we serve and protect', and frankly I would be happy to see the couple lodge a suit against officer Stephens and the police department
Posted by: Kimberly Agosta Location: Schenectady NY on Aug 23, 2008 at 04:56 PM
I just had the misfortune of seeing this video. To say I was shocked and appauled is an understatment. Fear and anxiety can make the strongest of us seem irrational. Officer Stephens is obviously a "burned out" in law enforcement. He has lost all of his ability to empathize with this gentleman. His comments are cold and crude. Pets are a family member to many. He lacks as much judgement as the gentleman driving 95 miles an hour on the freeway. At least the driver had a viable excuse. Chief Williams, you need to relieve this officer of his duties. I would not want this officer on my towns police force. He is not an asset to the community. Chief Williams, you should show him as much compassion as he showed the owners of the dog, NONE!
Posted by: Kim Location: Harker Heights, TX on Aug 23, 2008 at 04:55 PM
What an insensitive jerk...I am sure if he had a police dog that was choking like that, they would put it in a police car, turn on the lights and sirens and get it to the vet as soon as possible. This so called man needs to be removed from this police department. If he cant handle this situation, then what is he going to do in much worse scenerio. Everyone who travels IH 35 knows that speeding on that stretch of road at that time of night is very common. It doesn't make it right. I wonder what PETA and the SPCA thinks about this? I am in the medical field and as a nurse, I am quite sure he wouldn't appreciate me telling him that it just a kid. Because I have no kids. This guy is a complete idiot. He should be charge with crutely to animals. With his behavior he has some nerve berating this the victim because he is said he was bipolar.
Posted by: Mira Location: California on Aug 23, 2008 at 04:28 PM
That officer should go to jail for animal cruelty and fired. To many people their dogs are like their children and are just like a member of their families.I guess some officers take themselves to seriously to just simply care.
Posted by: Kym Location: Whitehall PA on Aug 23, 2008 at 09:41 AM
This is the most HORRIBLE INJUSTICE!! That cop better lose his badge!!! I can't believe that this is who we intrust to keep us safe!! Talk about Animal Abuse!! I call out to all to have this cop loose his job on the force!! This person is not even HUMAN! Sensitivity training, don't waste the time or money, he doesn't deserve it!! He needs to be fired!! I am OUTRAGED at this. If it were my dog, I would have kept on going!! But, who knew that someone, especially law enforcement, could act so CRUEL!! I just can't believe in this day and age that this could happen!! My dog is my baby, and I would do ANYTHING to protect him from harm!! This is just shameful!!
Posted by: Kathie Location: New Jersey on Aug 22, 2008 at 09:02 PM
I saw the video on Fox News and was shocked. He kept calling the man "DUDE". What kind of officer calls people he has just pulled over "DUDE". He handled the situation terribly and his social skills were even worse. I would not want him in my Community.
Posted by: JJ Location: Austin, Texas on Aug 22, 2008 at 07:25 PM
This officer is in dire need of sensitivity training. He should not be in a position requiring sensitivity and understanding. According to a radio show on KLBJ, Austin this occured in the middle of the night. How much other traffic could be in danger at such an hour. The officer should be on leave without pay for at least 30 days. He should be in training before he is allowed back on the streets. I have know idea what, if anything, may have caused the officer to be such a nuisance, but nothing going on in his life allows for such poor judgement. "Chill out, it's just a dog, you can buy another one." He must either hate dogs or minorities. Shame, shame, shame on you Officer Stephens and shame on you Chief Williams if you don't punish Stephens as sternly as the law allows. This is despicable.
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 22, 2008 at 05:41 PM
The man should go to prision for animal curelty. Plain and simple. For some of you who think he did the right thing, I disagree. How can you say dogs are treated better then black children? Black children get all of the benefits of being an American citizen while dogs are at the mercy of their human masters. What were they supposed to do? Drive the speed limit and what their dog die when getting there on time would have saved the dog's life? IF you love your pet your pet is like a child. This officer belongs in jail
Posted by: Tom Location: Omaha on Aug 22, 2008 at 02:51 PM
This officer does not possess the ability to be a peace officer. He should be removed from duty immediately and permanently assigned desk duties. If that does not meet with his requirements, I am sure there plenty who could replace him and do a far better job policing the community. POLICE CHIEF DO YOUR JOB. You need to represent public interest and remove this officer at once.
Posted by: Samson Location: New York on Aug 22, 2008 at 02:09 PM
How heartless and cruel. The officer should have offered to drive them and thier poodle to the vet and ticketed them there. What if the lady was in labor? Would he offer to drive them to the hospital? It is animal cruelty and he should be punished as so!!
Posted by: Carl Location: WI on Aug 22, 2008 at 12:29 PM
The officer should be fired. That simple. He has demonstrated poor judgement and that poor judgment will only be exercised again and again.
Posted by: Mary Location: North Carolina on Aug 22, 2008 at 11:08 AM
While I agree that the officer did not handle the situation as professionally as he could have, I agree with him siting the driver of the car. The comments would be much different if the officer had told the driver to drive on to the vet and the driver had killed another driver. While I love my pets, I would not put one of them before health/life of other people. "Customer Service and professional treatment" is such a thing of the past in many business'. Most agency's are not adequately staffed and do not have time to do a lot of training in customer service. I've read that the supervisor of this officer has reviewed the tape with him and offered suggestions of what could have been said that would have been more appropriate. I personally think that is sufficient. I would like to thank the officer for putting his life on the line every time he answers a call or pulls a vehicle.
Posted by: helga Location: Georgia on Aug 22, 2008 at 07:57 AM
This is a sad story. What surprises me is, that there are 135 comments mostly accusing the police officer of being cruel. Did you write also a comment when the 14 year old boy died from the hands of 8 boot camp employees. This was far more outraging. Why are dogs more worth than black children??? I am an animal lover, but the effort complaining about animal cruelty is making me sick compare to the effort you make complaining about that what this pack did to Martin and the government doing nothing!!!
Posted by: Linda Location: Oakdale, MN on Aug 22, 2008 at 01:05 AM
Shame on police officer Paul Stephens. He is replaceable and should be terminated from his job and be charged with animal cruelty. Police chief Howard Williams can get another officer.
Posted by: None Location: USA on Aug 21, 2008 at 08:19 PM
Forced at gunpoint to watch a loved-one slowy choke and die when help was just a few minutes away... I can not think of a more horrible form of psychological torture. I hope they sue and bankrupt that terrorist organization known as the San Marcos police!
Posted by: janet Location: gustafson on Aug 21, 2008 at 11:05 AM
I believe that Officer Paul Stephens was out of line and should be charged with animal cruelty as he let the dog suffer by choking to death. there is no reason in the world that this should have happened. What applies to people who abuse animals should be for someone who knows better also. Missy may or maynot have died if gotten into to the emergency vet. He took the power into his hands and an innocent life pet wise was lost. In all honestly he is not above the law and should be charged with animal cruelty.
Posted by: Diana Location: La Jolla, Ca on Aug 20, 2008 at 06:45 PM
This officer needs to find another line of work. The lack of empathy in one we trust to serve and protect is unacceptable. Reminds me of the puppy chucking Marine. Wonder how his fellow officers are enjoying their publicity nightmare. Get rid of this bad apple...
Posted by: Anonymous Location: California on Aug 20, 2008 at 05:24 PM
This is not about dog vs. kid though officer tried to justify his bad behavior by making the comparison. Nor is it about 80mph vs. 95mph which many do on a regular basis with no emergency at hand; both speeds endanger everyone (including the dog and his owners) perhaps a little less so at 12:45AM; driver never denied deserving the speeding ticket. It is about an officer who is more concerned with exercising his right of power than showing any kind of compassion, good judgment, or leadership to the people he allegedly serves. It is about a policeman who resorts to calling people "stupid" when he is challenged or questioned. It is about an arrogant cop who should not be allowed to carry a gun or deliberately detain others for his own ego gratification and pleasure in the face of their grief and loss.
Posted by: Lou Anne Location: Temple on Aug 20, 2008 at 03:53 PM
Fire the officer. If he has no empathy for a choking animal, especially a pet, he will have very little for people. It's a fact. You can tell a lot about a person by the way he treats an animal.
Posted by: Crystal Location: Canada on Aug 20, 2008 at 02:31 PM
And you people vote, to some people their pets are their children because for whatever reason they are childless. The guy was wrong to speed but the cop shouldn't have acted the way he did. It would be like telling a person whose trying to save their child or mourning the death of a child, it's a kid, you can have another one. Like humans, pets can't be replaced, it's a life not a toy. Billy: Use spellcheck next time.
Posted by: Jamie Location: Harker Heights on Aug 20, 2008 at 11:20 AM
I believe that it was wrong that you should not speed and cause others to be in harm. I believe that the officer could of at least be nice and check up on the dog to see if he was telling the truth and if so then be nice and not just plain rude and hurry up and give him his ticket and last help him out by escorting him with his lights on to get the pet to the vets as fast as he could don't you think. Also I hope that cop regets everything he did and have guilt over this every night he goes to bed because thats just plain wrong other than giving him the speeding ticket which I believe he did deserve.
Posted by: Anne Marie Location: Las Vegas, on Aug 20, 2008 at 11:06 AM
Has anyone started a petition to get this heartless, moronic officer fired? If yes, what is the website?
Posted by: Amy Location: Waco on Aug 20, 2008 at 10:38 AM
I once was speeding on the highway and was stopped and ticketed. While being ticketed, my car's water hose broke (had it checked before the trip). The policeman drove me to the nearest town, I purchased a hose, and he put it on my car so I wouldn't be stranded. Was a ticket deserved? Yes Did the policeman have to help me when my water hose broke? Not that way. That officer was amazing. The couple driving at 95mph deserved a ticket, but the issue is in how the policeman handled it. Be amazing; don't settle for what gets you by. Amazing doesn't always take much effort and it continues to reward you and everyone.
Posted by: Kristen Location: Indianapolis on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:44 AM
Billy- you cant even write or speak proper English. I bet you don't have a pet. You make no sense. No one thinks they should be allowed to speed, but the officer could have escorted the couple and shown some compassion. Not everything is black and white. The cop was on a power trip- that is obvious to everyone watching the video.
Posted by: Billy Location: Waco on Aug 20, 2008 at 08:34 AM
Some of you people discust me. Yes, it was a bad judgement call on his behalf. BUT! Due to this incident alone you want hime fired. Are you out of your dang mind. I bet that you are the same people that holler and whine and call for the police to due something then when they do. You fuss and bellyache because its not what you wanted. I am bettig that you are the type that get hit by your spouse and call 911 for help, and when the police you are crying not to arrest them. You cant have it both ways. Either let them do their job according to the law. OR, shut up.
Posted by: me Location: waco on Aug 20, 2008 at 07:38 AM
Wonder if this cop is related to the FBI agent that shot the little dog in Lorena?
Posted by: Janis Peace Location: Virginia on Aug 20, 2008 at 12:39 AM
Not his finest hour? I think this was the worst case of judgement I have ever witnessed by a "so called officer of the law". It is a disgrace! The things he said to these people are outrageous. Had he have been using his head instead of his muscle, he would have helped these people by following them to the clinic and then taken up any issues he had with his driving. I am ashamed of this person. He deserves to have an External Examination by all National News Stations and if it's any way I can get it done, I will. I hope his family is very proud of him. He is a real hero. He is nothing. You need to fire this creep. This time what went on in Texas didn't stay in Texas, did it?
Posted by: Alice Location: Texas on Aug 19, 2008 at 10:53 PM
Does this police officer (and I use that term loosely) have such a pitiful, unsatisfying life that he must take out his frustrations on a poor, innocent dog? Does he feel any guilt over causing the dog to suffer and die? Where did he grow up? I hope his parents and family are ashamed of his evil, apalling actions? When he encounters a situation where a human has been hurt or killed, does he comment, "don't worry, humans are a dime a dozen and there is one waiting for you in Africa."? For people who cannot have children for medical reasons, animals are their children. To be so inhumane is beyond belief. This officer needs to go re-think his life mission, and maybe he will realize that what he did is unforgivable and the act of a godless soul. I feel for this couple because my animal is my child, and that officer would have had to shoot me in the back to stop me!!!
Posted by: naomia on Aug 19, 2008 at 10:07 PM
he should be fired! he is not worthy of being a police officer! so cold and uncaring!
Posted by: Babs Location: Waco on Aug 19, 2008 at 09:04 PM
There's a reason you can't call an ambulance for a dog. It's because the law recognizes that saving a human life is a priority above saving a pet (duh). I say hooray for the police officer who stopped the idiot who could have killed a number of humans in his assinine quest to save a poodle.
Posted by: amy Location: dripping springs on Aug 19, 2008 at 09:03 PM
The police officer did what he was supposed to do and was obviously more concerned with the safety of the other humans on the road. This guy was driving up to 95 miles per hour... he was not concerned with the safety of others on the road... he was breaking the law. If he had driven at a reasonable speed he could have avoided this ticket and perhaps in doing so, could have saved his dogs life. Blaming this on the cop is total B.S. this was completely the drivers fault... they made the decision to break the law. Sure, it is sad that their dog died, but, it was a dog... and that is no excuse to break the law and endanger the lives of other humans on the road.
Posted by: Jeanne Location: Detroiy on Aug 19, 2008 at 08:45 PM
I was thinking along the same lines as Heidi from SC, who posted her comment on 8/19/08 at 12:44 a.m., people that are not animal lovers do not have a clue how much we animal lovers love our pets, and when I read the that comment the officer made, I was thinking the exact same thing, he said it is just a dog! go by another one, well like Heidi said if he were to lose a child, I wonder if he would feel like it is just a child, go have another one! whether it be a animal that is lost or a pet, it is still not the same person or pet that you have invested time and love in, and whether you buy another dog, or have another child there is still a great lost felt, and in each situation great sorrow is felt, because you can replace a pet or person, but it will never be that same pet or person!!!
Posted by: Sam Bam Location: CenTx on Aug 19, 2008 at 08:32 PM
Officer needs to find another line of work or until he reach's muturity. Some never do! Some learn it and some born with it. He does not have either! I watched the video and the one from KWTX.
Posted by: Kelly Location: Waco on Aug 19, 2008 at 06:29 PM
Thats just wrong- 20 min for ticket is insane- if you could see the pet in pain anyone with a heart would have let the family go-
Posted by: The Patriot Location: Texas on Aug 19, 2008 at 05:54 PM
The officer's mistake was the demeaning phrase, "It's just a dog, you can buy another one." He was right to stop this vehicle going almost 100 mph at night. And he was right not to let them continue driving in hysteria on the most dangerous highway in Texas. But, he could have been a hero if could have shown some sympathy and even helped to get this puppy to the vet. Btw, we don't usually see people post on here from all over the world. Did this story make world news? Just wondering....
Posted by: Art Location: Texas on Aug 19, 2008 at 05:16 PM
I hope that cop goes straight to hell.
Posted by: Von Cracker Location: This Cop's Neighbor on Aug 19, 2008 at 04:06 PM
I informed everyone in our neighborhood, his friends too, about this incident. We've decided to mock and shun him forevermore. Tomorrow, we're going to ask him to move out of the area! We don't want uncompassionate morons with guns living around us!
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008 at 03:16 PM
I agree with others that the problem was the cop was on a power trip. He was trying to get his quota of tickets and didn't care that someones dog was in distress. I know a lot of people that consider their pets their children because they can't have any. This cop should be fired and should have to pay for another dog. Shouldn't they be out trying to catch murderers and people actually doing crime around the city rather than dwelling on someone speeding because their pet was dying? This cop should be ashamed of himself.
Posted by: libarbarian on Aug 19, 2008 at 01:34 PM
Another example how most people who want to become Police Officers are morally unfit to wear the uniform they desire. Fire him and put a mark on his record so that he can never get a job above minimum wage again. There should be a "one strike" rule against people who abuse their badge. Ruin his life and send a message to all his similar compatriots who became police to bully people with impunity instead of helping them.
Posted by: RENFIELD Location: NJ on Aug 19, 2008 at 01:03 PM
DOG OWNERS ARE INSANE !!! FIRE THE COP ? ARREST THE SPEEDER... the dog is NOT a child, they should have called the doggie ambulance or called for police escort (yeah right).. a shame the dog died... worse if the idiot caused an accident with PEOPLE getting hurt... I feel bad for the dog... worse for having idiot owners... A DOG IS NOT A CHILD... one spot in the lifeboat ? the kid gets it.. NOT the dog !!! THANK YOU MR POLICE OFFICER FOR GETTING A DANGEROUS HAZARD OFF THE ROAD BEFORE HE KILLED SOMEONE.. A PERSON.. NOT A PET... AND AS A LESSON TO EVERYONE ELSE..? KEEP TO THE SPEED LIMIT AND YOU'LL GET THERE QUICKER AND SAFER...
Posted by: And you people vote? on Aug 19, 2008 at 12:19 PM
Lets put it into prespective. This couple was traveling down one of the largest and most crowded highways in Texas at a speed of 95mph to save a dog. Now lets take the same scenario, throw in less than ideal conditions and these people have an accident with other vehicles. Now how many lives have just been affected by this dog? Jesus, get a clue. If the life of this canine was so important and its life was on the line why stop in the first place? Would you stop if it was your child? Hell no! I own 11 dogs of all shapes and sizes and I am also a proud father of a new born and to say that my dogs rank as high as my child would be stupid. I would risk all to save my child, but I would only take a reasonable risk for my pet.
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008 at 11:53 AM
In America, to become a police officer you don't need more than just a HIGH SCHOOL diploma as a minimun requirement. Think about the next time you are driving somewhere and you see a cop driving around in his "police car" he/she does NOT have any more education than just another high school kid. I have more education than a cop that is why I hold a bachelor degree from an accredit university. The police academy DOES NOT equalize the education that you can obtain at an accredited university, therefore their judgements are to be POOR, because their education is just as POOR. All they are tought at the police academy is FORCE and most than anything physical training, what good can come out of that and IF they are fitted folks with a discent sense of judgement, maybe, "WE" the community can be a little bit more lucky when we are stopped by one of this LOW CLASS, LOW PAY and LOW EDUCATED police officers. The age and education requirement to enter the police academy are VERY LOW! A twenty one year officer cannot make as good judgement as a person who is full grown, mature and EDUCATED and this is why there are broken homes and destroyed families in this country. The low judgment that this cop portrayed toward this couple does not suprise me in any way, shape or form, because how much can he acquired from the police academy and how much was he been asked to know BEFORE he entered the police academy? It is not more than just another high school grad. As long as they don't raise the minimun pre-requirements and post-requirements there will always be cops like the one who denied help to that innocent's dog life and another citizen who suffer the consequences
Posted by: Marilyn Location: Mason, TX on Aug 19, 2008 at 11:03 AM
If you think Paul Stephens should be fired, please sign this petition: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/fire-san-marcos-police-officer-paul-stephens You can see the event on video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39sctITKM9g
Posted by: Carole Location: Turkey on Aug 19, 2008 at 10:34 AM
While most police officers are trying to do their duty, this one really is a jerk. FIRE HIM! As all pet owners know, your dog is like your child not 'just a dog'. Let the officer find another job as well as pay the couple for another poodle pup -- several hundred dollars.
Posted by: I'll NEVER DONATE MONEY OVER THE PHONE to PD WHEN THEY CALL MY HOUSE AND ASK FOR A DONATION on Aug 19, 2008 at 09:55 AM
I can see from one of the readings that the cops in other countries are far more efficient than in the United States, then the cops in America complain why they don’t get pay better, for the service they give, they don’t diserve more than a penny an hour. What this cop diserve is being FIRED, being SUE and loose the priviledge to serve the community for endangerment and cruelty to an animal. The dog die, hey! How THEY say to the community “You do the crime, you do the time!” That is EXACTLY what this cop should be doing JAIL TIME! And please…. do not feed him doughnouts, he don’t diserve it! But getting serious, from time to time the police department call my house to ask for MONEY donation, because of this I WILL NEVER DONATE A SINGLE PENNEY TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEN THEY CALL, NEVER! In name of this dog who died….
Posted by: Dana Location: Georgia on Aug 19, 2008 at 07:26 AM
This is absolutely ridicolus. This police officer should be terminated. This poodle in distress, was no different from a child.
Posted by: brett Location: australia on Aug 19, 2008 at 07:04 AM
the cop should be fired. he isn't a public servant, he is a public menace on a power trip. What an arrogant act to stand there giving someone a 15 minute lecture when the reason for their speeding is so clear. Give them a ticket and move on. Heck, offer to escort them. I've driven in texas and on i35, and heck people driving at 90mph isn't that unusual anyway. In fact, it was extremely unusual to see anyone at all going at less than 5mph OVER the speed limit. I'd sit at 65/70mhp dead-on the limit in fear of getting on of these world-famous power-tripping enforcers, and everybody would be passing! The cop hasn't just shamed his local police department -- he has shamed america.
Posted by: dadoes Location: El Campo, TX on Aug 19, 2008 at 06:48 AM
I've never had much respect for the holier-than-thou attitude that many police officers exhibit, and this incident drops the bar even lower.
Posted by: dominique Location: connecticut on Aug 19, 2008 at 04:18 AM
i first want to say that i have, for the most part a very healthy respect and appreciation for the public servants who serve and protect. let's also aknowledge that that it is understood that in a medical emergency, people will speed. now, just saw the video tape. it seems the officer was so hyped up on adrenalin after the initial chase that he could not think straight then made a fatal judgement call. if he caught someone choking a dog to death he would probably have been the first one to arrest them. a person who cannot cool down quickly enough in an emergency situation should probably learn how to before being given the authority to stop others from acting responsibly and certainly before being given a weapon as well. btw, accusing the poor driver of being on drugs and asking him if he wanted to be arrested for trying to explain he had a real emergency...nice touch...what a nightmare for this couple having to sit helplessly and watch their tiny beloved pet die.
Posted by: yesenia<3 Location: my room. on Aug 19, 2008 at 04:03 AM
Oh man that sucks. I would have just taken off my dog is choking and there is no way in hell i'm going to let it die over some idiot cop who doesn't hurry up. "/ poor dog. I would sue the cop!
Posted by: PN Location: The desert on Aug 19, 2008 at 04:00 AM
Fire the stupid cop for being an insensitive and unprofessional jerk who made unnecessary and rude comments in the middle of a traumatic event for a couple. Then tell him "Dude, chill out! It's just a job, you can get another one!" I know one thing for sure....I will think twice before bringing my service dog through San Marcos ever!!!!!! She is anything but "just a dog"!!!
Posted by: TJ Location: CA on Aug 19, 2008 at 03:41 AM
The police should of escorted the couple to the vet so the dog had a chance. To that couple it was family and they were not driving drunk.Some people don't have compasion, meaning the officer of Texas he does not have common sense.
Posted by: Disgusted Australian Location: Sydney, Australia on Aug 19, 2008 at 03:28 AM
US law enforcement, one of the many reasons people have no desire to visit your country. Good to see that in 2008, one of the supposedly more 'enlightened' countries still employs this sort of imbecile to hold and wield his own version of justice over obviously distraught citizens. My favourite line, "What are you on sir?" Great training, assume it's drugs first. Find out it is due to distress, then ridicule the cause. I hope he gets cancer.
Posted by: Helene Hicks Location: Gautier, Ms on Aug 19, 2008 at 03:14 AM
That cop sucks, how uncaring a man he was in that video...great compassion and bed side manor...NOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
Posted by: Australia Location: Sydney on Aug 19, 2008 at 01:32 AM
Both sides have a point in this situation. At the end of the day, the cop has to do what he can to ensure the publics safety however this guy had the ability to do something in this situation - that is to either take the dog and its owner to the hospital or escort the car there. This cop obviously has absolutely no compassion for dogs or their owners. And I doubt very much he owns a dog. Which is a shame.
Posted by: KEITH Location: NEW JERSEY on Aug 19, 2008 at 01:27 AM
I FEEL SO SORRY FOR THIS COUPLE THIS COP SHOULD LOSE HIS JOB. HE SAID ITS ONLY A DOG. WELL SORRY TO BREAK IT TO YOU OFFICER BUT SOME PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD CONSIDER THERE PETS FAMILY. AGAIN I SORRY FOR YOUR LOSS. I SAW THE VIDEO. THIS POLICE OFFICER WAS RUDE.
Posted by: Regina Caschetto Location: Stratford CT. on Aug 19, 2008 at 01:25 AM
The San Marcos police have apparently never seen the TV programs that show police officers escorting people to hospitals or doctors and then giving them a ticket. It's just a dog and your just a bad cop.
Posted by: Animal/People Lover Location: Massachusetts on Aug 19, 2008 at 01:17 AM
Plain and simple, that cop is a LOSER. I'm glad he is not employed or living in my state. Our cops have even gone so far as to saving baby ducks that fall into storm drains. He is a poor example of a compassionate human being, let alone a cop. Wouldn't want him coming home to me every night. It's cops like him that we can do without.
Posted by: heidi Location: sc on Aug 19, 2008 at 12:44 AM
i truly believe that officer should be punished in such a way that he'll remember this experience forever. He obviously doesn't understand how important our pets and all animals are to us and I could come up with some really appropriate punishment for him but I'm sure I'd go to jail for it. However, if that was me and my dog I wouldn't have pulled over till I got to the vet. Then he could have done whatever he wanted to me. Why doesn't he try buyin a new kid if his dies . Carma sucks sometinmes.
Posted by: David Location: Colorado on Aug 18, 2008 at 10:09 PM
I ask everyone the question "Have you ever had a time in life where common sense was lost to the situtation at hand". These people were trying to deal with this trauma. Did they deal with it correctly? No. Should they be ticketed. Yes. "What if's" aside, the individuals were stopped before any of the "if's" happened. Now the future is in the hands of the officer. He chose poorly. He could have represented himself and his department with pride and digity and maybe saved a life. Either way, if the dog had lived or died, if he had helped as he should have, he and his department would have shined. He chose to exert his authority with utter disregard for life. Is this someone that I want in a position of power? No. Should he be terminated for his actions? No. Should charges of cruelty to animals be filed? Yes. When he stopped the vehicle, he took on the responsibility for all the occupants, including the dog. Was it just a dog? No. It was a member of a family, a family now in mourning.
Posted by: Dave Location: Vancouver on Aug 18, 2008 at 09:03 PM
Here in Vancouver the Police spent almost $400,000 dollars for a police dog's funeral. Over 500 cops showed up from all over. Amazing amount of money for "Just a Dog". Oh sorry, a "Police" dog. Funny how the blue wall works when its on the other foot, or rather boot.
Posted by: suzanne Location: NC on Aug 18, 2008 at 07:47 PM
"One can measure the greatness and the moral progress of a nation by looking at how it treats its animals." - Mahatma Gandhi
Posted by: Lori Location: Greensboro, NC on Aug 18, 2008 at 06:38 PM
This is RIDICULOUS!!! The officer should be laid off-without pay for a month or so, to "chill out." After all, HE'S JUST A "COP!" There was NO REASON to detain these folks, especially when one offered to stay behind! Let's hope he NEVER stops a car carrying a "delivering Mother" ... he may also say "IT'S JUST CHILDBIRTH" ... this moron needs to be pulled off the streets and sent back to where ever he comes from ... obviously somewhere in this World there is a Village missing its IDIOT!!! I am so sorry for the "avoidable" horrible experience the pet owners had to go through. Completely uncalled for! Both my Brother and Sister are Police Officers, and would NEVER react in such a way. This officer is not only a DISGRACE to the Department, but to all the fine men and women who work hard each day to protect, NOT ABUSE, the people of this Country. If this "SAD EXCUSE OF A COP" would like to respond to me, my address is attached. Lori Carter
Posted by: Joe Location: New York on Aug 18, 2008 at 06:27 PM
To long has it been since the same thing happed to me. I told the cop to get out of my way or my lawyers were going to own his town. When he laughed I told him to follow me or he can arrest me and I just got in the car and drove to the vet. Obviously he followed me and wrote me a ticket, which by the way was tossed. The dog survived but the cop almost lost his job from pressure of others. If I was the couple I would set an example and sue for mental anguish at the very least they can fire the cop. A person especially an officer of the law is charged with up holding the law and protecting even the rights of animals. In this case he was negligent and should be charged with cruelty to animals.
Posted by: Phyllis West Location: Nashville TN on Aug 18, 2008 at 05:22 PM
No Wonder people have no respect for law enforcement. This cop's actions are a disgrace. He should have given the young couple a police escort to the emergency vet; and then he could issue a warning, or a ticket. He has no respect for humans, if he could just let a helpless animal die. I am disgusted by his behavior. Thank god he doesn't work in TN. I think the couple should be able to sue the government and him personally. He makes me sick to my stomach. WHAT KIND OF HUMAN BEINGS WORK FOR THE TEXAS POLICE ANYWAY.
Posted by: Jeanne Location: Detroit on Aug 18, 2008 at 04:00 PM
I am a animal owner, and I must admit this story is very upsetting to me, that officer should have showed more compassion for the couple that was rushing there pet to the vet, the time that he took to write the ticket, he could have as easily escorted them to the vet with the sirens flashing!!! I believe that he is a very heartless individual, as well as all of you other so called people on this site that feel like it is just a dog! go get another one, that dog was there baby, and people that do not own pets will never understand the love that a pet owner has for there pet/family member, because that is what they are, they are part of our families, and placed in the same situation I would do whatever I could to get my baby to the vet. God Bless America! and May God Bless All of you un caring individuals and soften your hearts!
Posted by: Just saying is all Location: Ft Hood on Aug 18, 2008 at 03:47 PM
OMG.....was gonna hit a bunch of people on grammer and spelling but I do not have that much time. So I'll pick a couple of the worst. Matt Up North - Hopefully your WAY up north and not in Texas. If so, please stay. Johnnie in Canada - If I were you I would be more upset over the educational system that allowed you to write "Is that cop stupid! Police should be their for us in a time of need. This cop does not meet the minium standards to be a cop. He is embarrassing to enforcement officers in Canada." Gee is Johnnie Stupid? I wonder what the minium standard of education is in Canada....
Posted by: LN Location: Robinson on Aug 18, 2008 at 03:26 PM
All of ya'll animal loving people need to quit thinking and responding with emotion and start using some calm logic. Yeah, the cop might have been a little out of line. But these people taking the dog to the vet were WAY out of line driving that fast on any highway in Texas. And for them to say that the cop was at fault for the dog's death is ridiculous. If the dog was that bad they should have left earlier. And why did it die? Did it eat something it shouldn't have? Were the owners careless in their care of the dog? Was it terminally ill? Did it get run over by a car because they let it run loose? The story doesn't say why the dog died. And what do you expect a Chief to say with a camera in front of her? Of course she is going to throw the officer under the bus. Until all of these facts are known it is best to not make judgements.
Posted by: JustDontKnow Location: UK on Aug 18, 2008 at 01:42 PM
Although I agree that the policeman was out of order, driving at that speed is reckless and a risk to the general public. Immagine how you'd feel if some idiot going over the limit hit and killed your child? Even if it was in the 'good cause' of getting the dog to the vet hospital.
Posted by: josh Location: delaware on Aug 18, 2008 at 09:28 AM
dont pull over just go to the hospital and let em ticket you there... another thing going 95 is nuts slow down! paramedics arent even supposed to go more then 10 - 15 mph over the limit even with someone dieing so chill out.
Posted by: Pedro Garcia Location: dudes neighbor. on Aug 18, 2008 at 09:23 AM
i agree weeth senior Dude, these Gnocchi person need to go bock home to hees own counthry an done come bock teel he learn some eengleesh.
Posted by: Dude Location: texas on Aug 18, 2008 at 09:11 AM
gnocchi,you need to capitalize the "G" in the name, if you are the english police you claim to be, you would know that...Gnocchi.
Posted by: gnocchi Location: Not Texas Thank God on Aug 17, 2008 at 06:07 PM
I can't find a single post here that doesn't have blatant errors of spelling and grammar. Maybe Texas needs to work on its (see, no apostrophe!) educational system so as to reduce incidents of blatant stupidity like this.
Posted by: Wryker Location: MA, CA & TN on Aug 17, 2008 at 05:39 PM
You people amaze me. I have children and pets. The lesson I've learned from this is that I will NEVER pull over if I'm driving someone to the hospital - be it canine or human. I'll let them ticket me at the hospital. For those that posted that speeding was wrong since it put others in jeopardy: there is NO animal ambulance so the only way to get help is to drive the canine: and i will drive like a madman if i ever have to to save mine. The officer should have offered an escort AND ticketed them. I'd take a fine over losing a loved one ANY DAY OF THE YEAR. Most of the posts here make me sick.
Posted by: Matt Location: Up North on Aug 17, 2008 at 04:18 PM
Ah, the Police State is alive and well. Welcome to Amerika, papers please?
Posted by: To Lynda on Aug 17, 2008 at 01:11 PM
SERIOUSLY? God help us all if we are ever on the road with you! Of course the officer shouldn't have made that comment, but it doesn't change the fact that the man was breaking the law. In fact, the officer could have arrested him instead of just issuing a ticket. The "speed thing" as you like to call it IS the issue. That's why the driver was pulled over. Not really sure how/why we should "get off" it. Perhaps you should spend a day or two with an emergency team and see what injuries resulting from an accident in which excessive speed was a factor can do to a person!
Posted by: Johnnie Location: Canada on Aug 17, 2008 at 12:40 PM
Is that cop stupid! Police should be their for us in a time of need. This cop does not meet the minium standards to be a cop. He is embarrassing to enforcement officers in Canada.
Posted by: ginny Location: cove on Aug 17, 2008 at 08:02 AM
i would like to say that the couple should not have waited so long to take the poor dog to the vet. it must have been sick for awhile for it to have died during a 20 minute period. the officer was wrong for the comment. but i don't think anyone owes them a new pet because it was their fault for waiting so long to have the poor little creature checked by a vet. i have a fur baby myself and she's like my child. if your pet it sick take it to a vet BEFORE it's an emergency. poor little fur baby.
Posted by: Linda Location: N.C. on Aug 17, 2008 at 07:56 AM
I understand this was a rookie cop; he also seems to be a rookie in human and animal compassion!! A perfect example of that blue uniform going to a cop's head... I just watched the video on GMA and the cop was found not guilty of misconduct but his CO said he handled the situation badly... Excuse Me!!! Cops are supposed to be there to help us as well as to uphold the law... Yeah, the guy was speeding... give him the ticket and let him go . Seems to me he made this traffic stop last 20 minutes to prove his point... "It's just a dog". Give me a break... I would venture to guess that this cop will do this type thing many more times in his career. Sorry, but I have no respect for someone who shows no respect for others, including animals.
Posted by: Lynda Location: Killeen on Aug 17, 2008 at 03:51 AM
To all who think he was driving to fast: Have any of you ever driven on 35 in that area?? If you are not driving 95, "grandma" and "grandpa" will run you off the road! The posted speed limit might be 60, 65, or even 70, but we all know!!!!!!! You better drive faster than that or you WILL be ran over! Get off the speed thing! The officer should have never made the comment that he made!
Posted by: anonymous Location: waco on Aug 16, 2008 at 08:03 PM
emergently?! Is that a word?
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 16, 2008 at 06:40 PM
I am an animal lover...but geez! This is why we have accidents on Interstates and highways. People driving way too fast over a DOG. I'm sure the dog was like a family member, but remeber...IT'S A DOG.
Posted by: GIVE me a BREAK! Location: Maryland on Aug 16, 2008 at 02:44 PM
All u people out there flippin over those kids doing 95, need to REALLY consider how many times YOU'VE driven close to that speed, FOR NO GOOD REASON! The speed limit on most interstates is 70 some even 75 where I'm from, so for those FRANTIC kids to go ewww...95, for the well being of their beloved pet, SO BE IT! What are u gonna chastize the husband that drives that fast to take his pregnant wife to the hospital? Or someone's who loved one in in respitory distress & is DYING & drives 15 miles over the speed limit?? Most ALL of "us" do it, or HAVE done it at some point, so stop blaming those poor people for acting emergently and driving too fast! I hope the next time YOUR in an urgent situation, WHOEVER's taking u to the nearest Hospital or wherever, goes at LEAST 10 miles over the limit!!
Posted by: Chris Location: Maryland on Aug 16, 2008 at 02:32 PM
I'm sure they wont post my last comment, but for the record....Since WHEN do cops get "coached"? Officer Smith's statement was that this was a "COACHING" issue? PLEASE! TRAINED or not trained....COACHED or not coached, the reason that poor little dog died was bc of that "rookies" disrespect for ANYTHING, other then being a bad a** cop & getting the satisfaction of writing a ticket! Its INEXCUSABLE behavior, and the dash cam caught it ALL! He should of let the girlfriend continue on so that dog didn't have to SUFFER, let alone DIE! What a MISERABLE excuse for a law enforcement agent! I hope to God that someone realizes that this was NOT an innocent mistake, or COACHING issue, and takes not only that guys BADGE away, but his GUN too, so he doesn't go & blow the head off some innocent speeder or just MIGHT be in some kind of DISTRESS!!
Posted by: David Location: Gatesville on Aug 16, 2008 at 01:27 PM
Unlike A Cop there is always A Dog around when you need one Both are cheep and they both need to be replaced.
Posted by: Jay Location: Connecticut on Aug 15, 2008 at 11:05 PM
Ignorant....thats what that officer was. Plain and simple.
Posted by: Pets Rule on Aug 15, 2008 at 09:35 PM
They should have been pulled over for going that much over the speed limit and endagering innocent people, but I belive the officer could have had more sympathy with them. Pets are FAMILY to some people who do have their head on straight and they need medical attention just like a child would. A rightous man has compassion for his animals. Pets are not the same as humans, but they are God's creatures too and deserve love, care and respect. Better judement should have been used and they should not have been driving so fast, but more compassion on the part of the officer might have made a difference in life or death of this pet.
Posted by: Jan Location: Corpus Christi, Tx on Aug 15, 2008 at 05:53 PM
My heart goes out to the San Marcos couple who's dog died because of an officer's negligence!! Another one of those people who SHOULD NOT be wearing a badge or worse ... carrying a gun!! I hope the little dog didn't suffer too long. Hey, Office Smith, dogs and all animals DO have feelings, and I pray you don't owe one!!!!!
Posted by: Corey Location: Temple on Aug 15, 2008 at 04:59 PM
Both parties are at fault. I am a dog lover and own two of them and would do anything i could to save them if i could...but driving 95 is way excessive. I would rather a dog die than kill myself or innocent humans trying to get him to the vet. Also, the officer was very wrong for his comment of "chill out, its just a dog you can buy another one." Even tho its not uncommon at all to see people going 95 mph on i-35 (i have a lead foot sometimes myself) they were going way to fast and didint handle the situion well at all. They really should learn to control thier emotions better. Also, if the dog died within that 20 mintues period chances are the dog would not have made it anyways and therefore the whole trip was MOOT!
Posted by: Not just a Dog's Owner Location: Waco on Aug 15, 2008 at 04:33 PM
I have a small dog which I and my fiance treat as our child, they are not just DOGs to a lot of people they are FAMILY, if the officer wanted to give them a ticket he could have escorted them to the vet and then gave them a ticket, there are officers that will do that!! This is just wrong!!! I feel for poor Missy's family!! I would speed to a vet for my baby too!! and I know several others that would as well, Matter of fact my sister did the day her baby was hit by a car that sped away!!!
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008 at 04:19 PM
Thanks for the lead to that story. Very interesting. The way Mr. Gonzalez was acting, he is luck he didn't end up face down eating asphalt. The officer did not get reprimanded for the detaining the couple or for the dog dieing, only for his little comment. Maybe he shouldn’t have said it, but maybe these people need to grow a thicker skin and get over it.
Posted by: Just sayin is all Location: Ft Hood on Aug 15, 2008 at 02:44 PM
From Austin to Dallas on I-35 has got to be the most rediculous, dangerous, pathetic excuse for a "highway" in America. I truely pity the people who have to drive on it everyday. From Austin to San Antonio is very marginally better, but not by enough.
Posted by: Sensible Location: Central Texas on Aug 15, 2008 at 11:21 AM
For those of you still defending Mr. Gonzalez, please go to KXAN.com, Austin News, and read the San Marcos Police Cheif's assessment of Oficer Stephens' dash cam video. How many fatal wrecks on I35 have made headlines in the past month! I35 is always too heavily traveled to drive that fast, no matter the excuse!
Posted by: EMT Location: Waco on Aug 15, 2008 at 10:13 AM
Something to think about: Many ambulance companies have internal policies stating that their drivers can only travel 10-15 MPH over the speed limit MAX (less if conditions are not safe). This is running with both lights and sirens to warn other motorists (and possibly with a dying patient in the back). Policies like this are for the safety of all those on the road, the patient, and the Paramedics/EMT's. This couple was traveling AT LEAST 25 MPH OVER! If I remember correctly, 20 MPH over is an arrestable offense. Now don't get me wrong, I am a dog lover, and I have a dog myself that I love very much. I also DO NOT believe the officer handled this in the best manner at all. THAT SAID, this couple could have killed an entire family on the highway. They put the life of each and every person on that road on the line...for a dog. Really, does that make sense? I think not.
Posted by: Krystal Location: Waco on Aug 15, 2008 at 09:51 AM
How would you know if 20 minutes is a long time to be stopped by the police. He has to see what your excuse is for you speeding at 95 miles per hour. He has to ask you for your drivers license, registration and proof of insurance. He has to run your information through the system to make sure you are not wanted for anything. He has to run the plate # to make sure the vehicle isn't stolen. All this to make sure you and the public stay safe and protected. Thank You For Keeping Me Safe.
Posted by: Just sayin is all Location: Ft Hood on Aug 15, 2008 at 09:49 AM
Hey KKK - You CAN replace the life of a human just like a dog D.A. But thats not to say a dogs life is more important than a humans, and as much as I love my dogs, I would never pick their lives over a humans. Wait, thats not true, there are a LOT of times I would pick my dogs over a humans but that would be on a case by case basis. I think the cop did a good thing by pulling these people over due to speeding, but I see people every single day all over this area and I imagine the state going JUST as fast for a lot less reasons. An excuse? no, but still true. And we dont really know how this stop went down. There are procedures the cop has to follow, like a LP check before he approaches and do we know that the couple werent screaming and yelling when he approached? Were they polite while explaining the situation? DO I understand thier pain and frustration? Absolutely. Do I understand the cops position? Oh yeah. Too many cops shot in traffic stops for him not to follow procedure.
Posted by: myOPINION Location: Waco on Aug 15, 2008 at 09:39 AM
Ok, people, they are CLAIMING that the officer said this, you don't know that it is true anymore than I do, we weren't there. And as far as the taking 20 min to write a ticket, maybe something showed up when he was running there plates, it does happen!!
Posted by: Sensible Location: Central Texas on Aug 15, 2008 at 09:08 AM
Good Comment Tony. What I would like to know is, why travel to New Braunfels from San Marcos to have your gravely ill pet treated. Is there not a veterinarian in San Marcos?
Posted by: michelle Location: killeen on Aug 15, 2008 at 09:05 AM
Bravo to Don! Thanks for the great comment!
Posted by: Randy Location: Bruceville on Aug 15, 2008 at 09:03 AM
IT'S A DOG!!!!!!! Anybody who puts innocent people in harms way just for a dog, ought to have their head examined. Especially little annoying worthless dogs like that.
Posted by: Gail Location: CenTex on Aug 15, 2008 at 07:38 AM
TO: Just Wondering-If it were a child it would be totally different, there would be no question. The couple would have gotten a police escort to the nearest medical facility. TO: God's LOVE- we do not go normally go to the same extremes to save an animals life, whether it be a dog, cat, lizard or cow, that we do to save a human life. The next time a cow wanders on to a road and gets hit, why not airlift it to an animal clinic? I don't think so. Get a grip! TO: e and Common Sense-I agree with you.
Posted by: Don Location: Texas on Aug 15, 2008 at 07:07 AM
Well, the name of the speeder and the name of the cop ought to tell you something. That's why it took 20 minutes to write a ticket. If Mr. Stephens is rushing his dying child to the hospital and gets stopped, I hope the cop tells him, "It's only a kid. You can get another one." Even though all dogs aren't nice, they are still living, breathing, thinking and feeling animals. I would say in a lot of cases the dogs are more humane that their human masters ever thought of being themselves. That is the reason people get attached to them the way they do. Man was given dominion over the earth to care for all living things. Man has really done a bang up job hasn't he.
Posted by: Tony Location: Waco on Aug 15, 2008 at 07:06 AM
Here's another "what if": What if they hit a dog or cat, while driving 95 mph, on their way to the vet? Is that dog or cat's life no more important than their dog's?
Posted by: Fedguy Location: Dallas on Aug 15, 2008 at 07:04 AM
The local officer was on a "blue line" power trip as most police are. But the animal owners were also out of line for supposedly doing 95 mph. Give the animal owners a ticket, suspend the officer for a week with no pay, and have the city purchase the owners another dog of their choosing.
Posted by: KKK on Aug 15, 2008 at 06:45 AM
THESE PEOPLE NEED TO BE PUT IN PRISON, GOING THAT FAST IS DANGEROUS. THE OFFICER IS RIGHT IT IS JUST A DOG AND YOU CAN REPLACE IT. YOU CANT REPLACE THE LIFE OF A HUMAN.
Posted by: Candy Location: Waco on Aug 15, 2008 at 05:43 AM
What a terrible thang to do and say I have my dogs and they are just like a family member I cant stand people who treat our dogs and cats like their nothing
Posted by: Jimmy Location: Belton on Aug 15, 2008 at 04:09 AM
What would all you pet-loving, cop-berating people say if the couple would have caused a wreck, killing some innocent person? I know, it didn't happen. But it could have. I guess, if one of you would have been injured by this couples carelessness, you would have just shrugged it off because a pet was involved. Get real.
Posted by: Pets are family too. Location: Lacy-Lakeview on Aug 15, 2008 at 12:49 AM
Did you know sometimes police intentionally stall the ticketing process, because they can. Tell them you are late and some will make sure you are very late, and they think it is funny. "Chill out, it's just a dog, you can buy another one." I hope he hears "chill out you were once a cop,but we can hire another one". Driving 95mph is not a good thing but 20 minutes to issue a ticket is a little much dont you think?
Posted by: What?!!! Location: Waco on Aug 14, 2008 at 09:21 PM
To Just Wondering, if you don't know the answer to that,.....you are an idiot!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Mac Location: TX on Aug 14, 2008 at 09:01 PM
I would have capitalized on the situation. I would have placed the dog in my patrol car used my highly trained driving skills, sirens, lights, and showed the couple that police are special people. One who cares and go out of their way to assist the public! One cop with compassion and yet, not ashamed of what people think of my weekness for life, even if it is a dog! Yes, I would have been an idiot in front of many people but, a hero for the couple. Hell, what is wrong with giving instead of taking!
Posted by: e Location: nuff on Aug 14, 2008 at 08:56 PM
OHHH give me a break "god's love". All life? Should officers stop driving to prevent killing countless gnats and mosquitos? I think serve and protect only goes so far. Also, I'd love to see the video on this stop. I'm sure that it wouldn't have lasted 20 minutes if Gonzales if had just taken his ticket and went on his merry way. However if you think 20 minutes is too long: find someone you don't know, approach them on a busy highway, then while you're with them call someone and ask them to write down the unknown persons information down, then have them call you back with it. Then go back to the unk person and ask them their info all over again. Bet you can't do it in 15.
Posted by: me Location: temple on Aug 14, 2008 at 08:44 PM
people its a dog an animal not a human people need to come back to the land of the sane
Posted by: RU Kiddin Location: reality on Aug 14, 2008 at 08:32 PM
Those people put dozens of lives in jeopardy driving 95 miles an hour on the interstate- the officer probably shouldn't have said that, but how was he to know it wasn't just another excuse for idiot driving.... have you seen the damage a car going 95 mph can do to another car??? It can obliterate it... at that speed it only takes a slight error to